Lorem Ipsum

Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Terms of Stipulation for Settlement

Entry of Judgment Pursuant to Terms of Stipulation for Settlement – Avoiding Pitfalls in the Use of CCP Sections 664.6 and 664.7

Date: May 15th, 2015 by Grant R. Mullen No Comments

You have worked very hard to get a case ready for settlement or trial and the parties are now ready to settle the case in its entirety. You, the parties and counsel have spent hours hammering the general terms of the settlement out and you want to put the terms on the record or in writing quickly, so the settlement … Read More


Improper Withholding of Retention Results in Penalties

Date: April 8th, 2015 by John Schroeder No Comments

The recent case of FTR International, Inc. v. Rio School District (2015) DJDAR 1141 has shifted the balance of power to contractors in public works projects.  The FTR Court held that under Public Contract Code § 7107, a public agency could not justify their refusal to release the retention because of disputed change orders not related to the retention.  Public … Read More

Reforms to Construction Defect Litigation Signed Into Law in Nevada

Reforms to Construction Defect Litigation Signed Into Law in Nevada

Date: March 3rd, 2015 by Robert L. Thompson No Comments

On February 25, 2015, Governor Sandoval signed into law Assembly Bill 125 which significantly reforms Nevada’s construction defect law statute, also known as “Chapter 40.” The reforms to the statute have been an ongoing issue in previous legislative sessions over the past 10 years and will have a significant effect on subsequent construction defect litigation in Nevada.

Originally, the purpose … Read More

Construction Law

Design Professional Liability

Date: July 7th, 2014 by Brendan J. Coughlin No Comments

The California Supreme Court has agreed to review a case greatly affecting construction defect litigation. All working contractors and subcontractors know how difficult it can be to force design professionals to be involved in construction litigation, even when their work is clearly at issue.

From the beginning of a case, established law tips in the favor of design architects and … Read More


Offers of Judgment in Construction Defect Cases in Nevada

Date: March 25th, 2014 by Kring Chung No Comments

Offers of Judgment in Nevada are governed by Nevada Revised Statute 17.115 and Nevada Rule of Civil Procedure 68. At any time, up to ten days before trial, any party may serve on one or more of the parties, a written offer to allow judgment to be taken in accordance with the terms and conditions of the offer. The opposing … Read More


Defending Stucco Defect Allegations

Date: January 21st, 2014 by Paul T. McBride No Comments

Approximately 80% of construction defect lawsuits which we defend involve stucco-clad houses. Depending on the plaintiffs’ expert, alleged stucco defects usually comprise anywhere from 20% to 50% of the total cost of repair. Therefore, it is important for those involved in defending stucco subcontractors to understand, and so be better able to defend, stucco defect allegations. In this article, we … Read More


Another Important SIR Decision

Date: November 7th, 2013 by Brendan J. Coughlin No Comments

The recent California case of American Safety Indemnity Co. v. Admiral Insurance Co. (2013) 220 Cal. App. 4th 1, confirms that policy language must be unambiguous when an insurer seeks to limit its obligations under an insurance policy. In this matter, the Court of Appeal found that while the language at issue clearly imposed a $250,000 Self-Insured Retention (“SIR”) on … Read More


Court of Appeals Interprets SB 800 Time Limitations as Inapplicable Where Actual Damage is Alleged to Have Occurred

Date: September 30th, 2013 by Paul T. McBride No Comments

California’s Right to Repair Act, set forth at California Civil Code Sections 895-945.5, and commonly referred to as “SB 800,” allows homeowners to recover the cost to repair certain specified construction defects even though no actual damages have yet occurred because of the defects.  SB 800 was enacted in 2002 in response to the California Supreme Court’s decision is Aas Read More


Understanding contractor and construction surety bonds in California

Date: September 4th, 2013 by Sara Aisenberg No Comments

Earlier this summer, Mr. John Schroeder of Kring & Chung, LLP wrote an article about bidding mistakes in public contract projects. In his article, Schroeder discusses the mistakes that most often occur during the bidding process and uses real examples to explain how complex the bidding process can be. One of the complexities he discusses is surety bonding. Many … Read More


Bidding Mistakes in Public Contracts

Date: June 5th, 2013 by John Schroeder No Comments

It is four o’clock on Friday afternoon and you have been working on your bid to the general contractor all day. The bid is due by five o’clock and you are finally ready to bring the numbers over from your workup sheet to the formal bidding form provided by the general contractor in his instructions to bidders. Then it happens……you … Read More